We have an update for our members that attended the Massachusetts Everest College and filed a borrower defense to repayment (DTR). On June 25, 2020 the Federal Courts issued a ruling that ordered the Department of Education to discharge the debts related to DTR for individuals that attended this campus. This is a massive win that we hope will set a precedence in other court rulings. Though nothing is promised.
We will continue to fight for full debt cancellation on ALL student debt.
Here are a few highlights:
For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that:
(1) the DTR Application was a valid borrower defense application on behalf of all individuals who took out federal student loans to pay for the cost of attendance for students listed in Exhibit 4, including those who took out Parent PLUS loans;
(2) defendants constructively denied the DTR Application without rendering a reasoned decision, thus violating the APA’s prohibition on arbitrary and capricious agency action; and
(3) plaintiffs have established that they are entitled full loan discharges and a favorable borrower defense decision pursuant to 34 C.F.R. § 685.206©(1) (eff. until Oct. 16, 2018).
Accordingly, the Court hereby:
(1)ALLOWS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment, Doc. No. 38;(2)DECLARES that the DTR Application was a valid borrower defense to repayment application submitted on behalf of all individuals who took out federal student loans to pay for the cost of attendance for students listed in Exhibit 4;
(3)SETS ASIDE the defendants’ constructive denial of the DTR Application for borrower defense relief submitted on behalf of all individuals who took out federal student loans to pay for the cost of attendance for students listed in Exhibit 4;
(4)DECLARES that plaintiffs have established a right to borrower defense relief for all individuals who took out federal student loans to pay for the cost of attendance for students listed in Exhibit 4
(5)DECLARES that plaintiffs are entitled to full loan discharges pursuant to the agency’s settled course of adjudication;29
(6)REMANDS this matter to the Secretary to render a reasoned decision not inconsistent with this Order;
(7)ORDERS the Secretary to issue her reasoned decision within 60 days of the issuance of this Order or such further time allowed by the Court;3